Microsoft: Hotel California
Jason Spilkin April 2026
Technology never moves in a straight line. It lurches, pauses, then suddenly accelerates. The 1980s put personal computers on office desks, replacing hulking mainframes. The 1990s unleashed the internet, minting new winners while quietly killing off old business models. In the 2010s, faster connectivity made cloud computing cheap enough to go mainstream. Look at that arc and it’s hard to argue with the conclusion: artificial intelligence is the next big turn in the road.
History, though, has a habit of humbling technologists. The best product doesn’t always win.
Take the PC wars of the 1980s. Apple had the flashier kit and smarter ideas. It pioneered the graphical user interface and the mouse concepts that now feel as natural as breathing. But Apple priced its machines at a premium. On the other hand, IBM went the other way, building cheaper PCs for conservative enterprise buyers, using off the shelf components and outsourcing the operating system to a tiny outfit called Microsoft.
That decision would age badly. By letting others build “IBM compatible” clones, IBM turned its own hardware into a commodity and crushed its margins. Worse, it handed Microsoft control of the software layer. By the mid 1990s, Windows ran on more than 90% of PCs. In a neat twist of irony, neither Apple nor IBM really won the PC era, but Microsoft did.
Price discipline matters more than bragging rights. Apple stayed cool. Microsoft became indispensable. It rode IBM’s enterprise relationships, built an army of resellers and consultants, and offered customers a simple deal: one supplier, one bundle, everything you need. Its sales tactics became infamous. Want Windows? You had to buy the whole package. That strategy culminated in the antitrust “trial of the century” settled in 2001, by which time Microsoft was already the default enterprise standard.
Microsoft’s knack for timing showed up again in software. Contrary to popular myth, it didn’t invent the spreadsheet or the word processor. Lotus and WordPerfect came first. But they were designed for a world of text commands. Microsoft built Excel and Word for Windows with menus, icons, drop downs, and no requirement to memorize formulas. When Microsoft Office became a bundle, competitors didn’t stand a chance.
The same pattern played out in the cloud. Microsoft was late. Then Satya Nadella took over in 2014 and pulled the company onto a new trajectory. Azure is now the world’s number two infrastructure as a service platform behind Amazon Web Services and it’s growing faster. As IT workloads move off premise, Microsoft captures a bigger slice of corporate budgets across infrastructure, platforms and software, while still telling customers they’re saving money.
Bundling remains the playbook. New cloud products are often cheap, or free, at the start. Adoption comes first. Switching costs come later. CTO’s trust Microsoft. Nobody gets fired for choosing it. Prices quietly rise once customers are locked in.
Slack learned this the hard way. Launched in 2014, it quickly dominated workplace messaging. In 2016, Microsoft rolled out Teams and bundled it into Office at no extra cost. Today Teams has hundreds of millions of users. Slack has a fraction of that. It wasn’t a fair fight.
AI looks familiar. Microsoft moved early with OpenAI and threaded AI tools through its stack, from infrastructure to so called “agentic” applications that research, draft and code. What it lacks is a home grown foundation model of its own. That may not matter. Training models is brutally expensive and increasingly commoditized. Apple has already decided it’s not worth the fight, choosing instead to partner.
Azure now offers a menu of models, including Claude, GPT and others, which are accessed through Microsoft’s platform for security and compliance reasons. Different models do different things well. Copilot can route tasks to the right one. Tech expert users can fine tune for cost, speed or performance. Nadella’s framing is telling: agents are the new apps, and Microsoft wants to own the platform they run on.
Recently, investors have started to worry. If AI slashes software development costs, won’t that trigger a wave of cheap competitors and commoditize software altogether? The bears see a looming software-as-a-service apocalypse.
That misses Microsoft’s real strength. It has never needed to be first. It just needs to be fast enough and big enough. There’s a long running joke among developers: Microsoft’s first version is bad, the second is better, the third finally nails it. With AI assisted coding, those iterations could now happen in months, not years. Cheap startups won’t just build faster. Microsoft will too.
Early signs suggest AI is a tailwind, not a threat. At a recent enterprise showcase, Anthropic pitched Claude as an elite executive assistant, brilliant at PowerPoint decks and Excel formulas. Conveniently, those are Microsoft products.
Microsoft’s platform advantage looks intact. Like Hotel California, you can check in at any time you like, but leaving is another matter entirely.
This communication does not constitute an investment advertisement, investment advice or an offer to transact business. The information and opinions expressed in this communication have been compiled from sources believed to be reliable. None of Credo, its directors, officers or employees accepts liability for any loss arising from the use hereof or reliance hereon or for any act or omission by any such person or makes any representations as to its accuracy and completeness. Any opinions, forecasts or estimates herein constitute a judgement as at the date of this communication. Credo Capital Limited is a company registered in England and Wales, Company No: 03681529, whose registered office is 8-12 York Gate, 100 Marylebone Road, London, NW1 5DX. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FRN:192204). © 2025. Credo Capital Limited. All rights reserved.
